Rendered at 03:01:34 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
anlsh 37 minutes ago [-]
Man what a beautiful bit if knowledge, reminds me a bit of the eel mystery. Thanks to the researchers doing this sort of work, and I hope their conservation efforts go well
The article seems to be free for me (with adblock?). Also, the link does not work.
rsingel 5 hours ago [-]
The site has a client-side registration wall loaded by JavaScript to obscure the full text that is already loaded in your browser.
If scripts are turned off in your browser or if you press a reader mode button, those kinds of registration walls won't load.
ericpruitt 8 hours ago [-]
I have uBlock installed, and I got an overlay wanting me to enter my email address to read the article.
kwanbix 7 hours ago [-]
Works fine for me in Firefox with uBlock.
shellerik 11 hours ago [-]
I can't get past the captcha
forbiddenlake 10 hours ago [-]
You're using Cloudflare DNS, so archive.is refuses you. If you switch to a DNS server that forwards ECS it will work.
pvaldes 2 hours ago [-]
Resume: A type of small kestrel migrates each year to some place in Africa, nobody knew where, until now.
bentt 7 hours ago [-]
Is this what all those Flock cameras are for?
cute_boi 7 hours ago [-]
Flock cameras are for surveilling normal citizen and is used for suppressing freedom, quelling protests and to fulfill capitalist wildest dream to make America like China not for flocks of falcons.
IncRnd 7 hours ago [-]
It appeared to be a question about Flock cameras. It really was a double entendre where Flock could be taken to mean a flock of birds. Normally, explaining a joke removes all the humor.
yannis 5 hours ago [-]
Reading the article, makes me think that mined areas are good for conservation. When the Angolan area where they congregate is demined their numbers might start declining.
bogzz 8 hours ago [-]
The falcons were found congregating on an obscure German forum from the early 2000's.
BlackRabbit1 8 hours ago [-]
What kind of frequencies do these falcon trackers use? Any datasheets available?
Let us build FalconNogs (like Satnogs) with SDRs!
ghgr 10 hours ago [-]
They weren't "missing": GPS-tagged red-footed falcons revealed that they migrate to a tiny communal roost in central Angola (“Falcopolis”) each February–March.
There, saved you a click (disappointed on National Geographic for that clickbaity headline).
throwup238 9 hours ago [-]
They were missing. Then they used GPS tags to locate them.
That’s why the article is titled “ A Million Falcons Went Missing. Here’s How They Were Found”.
Something was unknown, then we used sensors to solve the mystery. Wild, isn’t it?
toast0 8 hours ago [-]
I wish I could put gps tags on things after they go missing...
8 hours ago [-]
antonvs 9 hours ago [-]
According to the dictionary definition of "missing", they were not missing.
At best, our assumptions about where we expected to find them were wrong.
throwup238 8 hours ago [-]
What dictionary are you using?
I just looked it up and MW’s definition of “missing” is “absent” or “lost” or “needed or expected but not included”. Dictionary.com says “absent, not found, or lost” and “lacking”. Wiktionary says “Not able to be located; gone, misplaced”, “Not present when it (they) should be”, and “Of an internal combustion engine: running roughly due to an occasional lack of a spark or other irregular fault.”
antonvs 6 hours ago [-]
Why do you think any of those definitions fit the case of the falcons?
I took a look at “MW’s” web definition and it seems singularly lacking. Perhaps you should consider purchasing a real dictionary.
A common theme is that for something to be “missing,” it should not be where you expect it to be. But if your expectation is invalid, then it’s not “missing,” you simply have wrong expectations, which is the case with these falcons.
For example, I could say that there are a million falcons missing from my front yard right now. Do you think that’s a valid way to describe it?
markdown 8 hours ago [-]
So my keys have never truly been missing, eh?
jstanley 8 hours ago [-]
So everyone else's keys are missing materially all of the time?
antonvs 6 hours ago [-]
You have a valid reason to expect that your keys are in the place you remember leaving them.
That’s not the case with large flocks of living animals. In that case, you’re simply making a category error in imagining that those living animals behave much like your keys.
brianpan 8 hours ago [-]
Is this actually clickbait? The title is in the form of many clickbait title, but I'd argue it delivers; the article is more interesting than the title.
I suggest readers spend the click and the five minutes.
rsingel 5 hours ago [-]
It's written by Ed Yong, who is a national treasure.
Hell yes, you should read it.
ripe 9 hours ago [-]
Thank you for summarizing!
TIL about the Falcopolis in Angola.
antonvs 9 hours ago [-]
> disappointed on National Geographic for that clickbaity headline
I don't think there's a single name brand from "before internet" that has survived without turning into a clickbait chaser of ad revenue above all else.
If scripts are turned off in your browser or if you press a reader mode button, those kinds of registration walls won't load.
Let us build FalconNogs (like Satnogs) with SDRs!
There, saved you a click (disappointed on National Geographic for that clickbaity headline).
That’s why the article is titled “ A Million Falcons Went Missing. Here’s How They Were Found”.
Something was unknown, then we used sensors to solve the mystery. Wild, isn’t it?
At best, our assumptions about where we expected to find them were wrong.
I just looked it up and MW’s definition of “missing” is “absent” or “lost” or “needed or expected but not included”. Dictionary.com says “absent, not found, or lost” and “lacking”. Wiktionary says “Not able to be located; gone, misplaced”, “Not present when it (they) should be”, and “Of an internal combustion engine: running roughly due to an occasional lack of a spark or other irregular fault.”
I took a look at “MW’s” web definition and it seems singularly lacking. Perhaps you should consider purchasing a real dictionary.
Cambridge is a bit better: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/missi...
A common theme is that for something to be “missing,” it should not be where you expect it to be. But if your expectation is invalid, then it’s not “missing,” you simply have wrong expectations, which is the case with these falcons.
For example, I could say that there are a million falcons missing from my front yard right now. Do you think that’s a valid way to describe it?
That’s not the case with large flocks of living animals. In that case, you’re simply making a category error in imagining that those living animals behave much like your keys.
I suggest readers spend the click and the five minutes.
Hell yes, you should read it.
I don't think there's a single name brand from "before internet" that has survived without turning into a clickbait chaser of ad revenue above all else.
The term for this is "late stage capitalism".